Taipei is Planning to Bid 2030 Asian Games?

It is not the first time to heard that Taiwan (Chinese Taipei) wants to bid Asian Games but the first thing came to my mind when I heard the news was ‘Do you think China will agree with you to host Asian Games?’

BUT

Firstly, besides China, this outside threat, we have to understand why Taipei needs to host Asian Games. There is a book which named ‘Start with Why’ which is my favorite book. Apparently, the main point of this book is to explain how important if people know their ‘WHY’ when they are doing something.

Taipei City Mayor Ko, Wen-je said: Taiwan should go global and should not be restricted to one place all the time. In my opinion, this “WHY" has strong power to inspire all Taiwanese that we need to host 2030 Asian Games and how this mega-sport event will benefit us. However, there are still some political issues on it.

I am not talking about China but the political issue inside of Taiwan. 2020 is the Presidential year and Ko is one of the candidates. This reason brought many argy-bargy right after Ko throw out this plan in the Taipei City Council.

Some of city councilors questioned Ko that Ko throws out this plan at this moment is for getting more supporters for the Presidential election next year.

I would say that it might be. But thanks to that I am still a PhD student in National Taiwan Sport University and the director of Taipei City Government Sport Department who is also a professor from my university, so I knew that the plan of bidding 2030 Asian Games is launched for few years.

Also, Taipei as the capital city of Taiwan which might be the best choice for hosting this mega-sport event to announce that Taiwan is still taking important part of this world.

Secondly, let’s talk about the international situation…or just the relation between China and Taiwan. Since Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won the Presidential election in 2016 when the first female President appeared in Taiwan, China and Taiwan has stopped many communication paths, the example of it in sport, it’s the less communication between China Olympic Committee and Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee.

The former President of AIBA and International Olympic Committee Executive member Wu, Ching-Kuo said that we need not only to learn from the failure experience but also to seek China’s ‘understand’. So how to get China’s support (or permit?) is the most important thing to do if Taipei wants to get the hosting right of 2030 Asian Games.

According to the media report that there are at least six potential bidders for 2030 Asian Games: India, South Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Uzbekistan.

India is the one of fastest economic growth counties nowadays but there is no enough infrastructure to host Asian Games, but it is still hard to say that because of the last year’s edition in Jakarta.

South Korea might be the best choice for the Olympic Council of Asia. With the success experience of Incheon Asian Games, South Korea equites with eligible conditions to host Asian Games.

If we consider that 2022 in China and 2026 in Japan, the future two year’s editions of Asian Games will be in North Eastern Asia, perhaps, Philippine and Thailand have stronger reason to be chosen as 2030 Asian Games because of the areas’ balance.

Honestly, I don’t have enough information about Uzbekistan, I can’t give comment on it. But let’s think of what the strength of Taiwan is and how we creat a affecting story to tell this world that we are ready to host this mega-sport event and not only we need it but also it needs us, needs Taiwan!

人工草皮 V.S 天然草皮

最近看見身邊的前輩們,紛紛在運動視界上發表對於「2017臺北世界大學運動會」的論述文章,激起了我想動筆寫下這篇的小宇宙。

大巨蛋、選手村及足球場,這幾天來備受媒體朋友及民眾的關注,以足球場來說:到底人工草好還是天然草好?第一次關注到這個議題要感謝這篇新聞「世大運「人工草皮」恐花14億 議員質疑沒必要」。

首先,我想針對內文中許議員提出的觀念做個闡明,根據內文指出:

北市議員許淑華也說:「其實我們有沒有必要為了一個世大運的賽事,每個展館都必須要鋪人工草皮來處理,那顯然我們知道的,足球在台灣並不是主要項目,比較符合國際賽事的用人工草皮,那其他的就用天然草皮來舖設就好,這樣可以節省比較多經費。」

事實上,比較符合國際賽事的足球場地是天然草皮。過去FIFA的場地規範中,也是以天然草地為認證場地。一直到近年來,才開放人工草地經過二星認證後,用於正式的足球賽事之中。

FIFA人工足球場二星認證系統

 此外,天然草與人工草的造價差異,事實上也不像新聞中所說的14億 v.s 5.8億這麼誇張,單就人工草場地(不含周邊附屬設施),每面造價約為2,500萬~3,000萬。而天然草造價因場地品質差異性極大。

足球場地所用的天然草皮與一般我們印象中的學校操場草地,其實是天差地遠的兩件事(或許新聞所說的造價便宜很多是指學校操場吧)。

過去我們印象中的操場草地、足球場地都具備以下這些特徵:地板硬得要命、下雨就積水、不是雜草一堆就是草地禿頭還外帶凹凸不平,絕對不會像我們在看世界盃足球賽那樣綠意盎然的草地。

國內足球場地(取至網路)
國外足球場地(取至網路)

首先,我們得了解正確的天然足球草皮的組成與施工過程,如下圖:

FIFA認證標準足球場剖面圖

關鍵在哪裡?就在綠意盎然草皮下方那咖啡色的那層,是什麼?是沙!

      為何國內足球場地容易積水?因為是土。為何國內足球場地地質硬?因為是土。為何國內草皮容易受損?因為積水在表層,草根不須深根便有足夠的水源,所以草根皆在土壤表層。

      根據FIFA的規範中,種植草地的表土中沙、土及碎石級配都有一定比例的規範。這部分自然也影響到了天然草的造價,以及後續的維護費用。

      各位不妨可以想像一下沙漠的情景,沙漠中植物為何少?除了水源以外,就是因為沙本身沒太多養分,因此後續的場地維護施肥變成很重要的一項成本。沙漠是否會積水呢?除了烈日曝曬的快速蒸發外,雨水一落沙地會迅速滲入沙地中,也因此沙漠植物為了尋找水源,根也會延伸的特別深,以利在地下尋找水源,這也就是為何用沙鋪成的球場不易積水且草根深不易被鏟壞。

      若以專業的天然草球場來看,其造價不輸給人工草,但更重要的是在於後續的維護成本與使用性,以國外足球俱樂部對於草地的維護可說是像在照顧嬰兒一樣呵護至極,打洞、施肥、播種、光照、殺菌,在沒有職業足球且足球風氣尚未盛行的台灣,無非是要交由政府來負責(納稅人的錢)或是放任它回歸學校操場般的適合男女老少一同來野餐,待下次舉辦大型運動賽事時,再來翻修一番。

這也是為何會有人工草產品問世的原因。

人工草皮的好處,不外乎是:維護成本低、使用頻率高、讓氣候不適合的國家使用以及室內足球場。

      但相對人工草皮也不會只有優點,從過去國外的文獻指出:運動員仍舊習慣在天然草上進行比賽,且在天然草上較不易受傷(專業的沙地軟、草根的支撐性強)。

       人工草場地的組成,除了塑膠草本身以外,還有鋪設1公分的沙&1公分的橡膠顆粒,在高溫曝曬之下,塑膠草&橡膠顆粒吸熱帶來的高溫、氣味以及環境污染(!?),也是人工草場地的缺點。

      我認為我們現在所面對的問題,不是只有天然草&人工草兩個選項,而是人工草&一般天然草&真正可以讓足球賽事好好使用,且後續能夠好好維護的天然草。

正所謂「沒有最好,只有最適合」

       依台灣足球發展現況及足球產業的經濟產值來看,筆者認為是人工草最為適合。103年教育部體育署推出「足球中程計畫」,期望能擴大台灣的足球參與人口。

       倘若,我們的球場是用完沒多久不維護的天然草或是不輕易對外開放的高水準天然草,筆者認為皆不適合用在處於全民足球運動推廣階段的台灣。

P.S 紛擾的台灣,需要的不是一人一槍的質疑,很多關鍵資料動動手,都有答案。文章中的重要資訊取至於:FIFA Football Stadium Guideline 2010